Algorithm 4 for management of Fracture and Dislcocation around Hip Joint


Old Unreduced Dislocations and Fracture Dislocations



Examination
FADIR
Shortening
Wasting
ASIS often high due to adduction deformity
Round hard , globular swelling palpable in gluteal region
Crepitus
Movement – present only in sagittal plane
Inverted Bryan’ts Triangle
Sciatic Nerve injury (Foot drop )
D/D
            Pathological Hip Dislocation (TB Hip ,Septic Arthrits )
            TB with Destruction of head (painful global restriction of motion in active stage or fibrosis or             ankylosis or hypermobile unstable hip in healed disease )
            AVN hip with destruction of head will have secondary OA and often have external rotation
            Old Unreduced Fracture Neck Femur
           
Investigation
            Xray –
            - Loss of congruity of femoral head and Acetabulum
-          Broken shenton Minard line
-          Proximal migration of greater trochanter
-          Smaller Obturator foramen
-          Samallr Ilium
-          Less prominent trochanter
-          Adducted Femur


CT – To assess associated fracture of Acetabulum ,
MRI –to look for vascularity of head and condition of acetabular soft tissues
Management
            Depends on Thompson and Epstein Classification and Vacularity of Head and Patients condition
Thompson and Epestein for posterior dislocation
Type I
Posterior Dislocation +/- Acetabular fracture
Type II
Posterior Dislocation +/- Posterior wall fracture
Type III
Posterior Dislocation + communited rim fracture acetabulum
Type IV
Posterior dislocation + Rim and floor fracture
 Type V
Posterior Dislocation + Head of femur fracture

Management
Type I
<  3 months – CR under GA , Gupta’s traction
>3 months – Gupta’s method
                Open reduction via anterior or anterolateral approach

Type II
 < 3 months – Open Reduction + Acetabular Reconstruction , Preliminary traction
>3 months – Arthroplasty versus Arthrodesis
(Acetabular cartilage damaged during soft tissue curettage )

Type III
Like Type II

Type IV and V
Younger Patients
            Open Reduction and Reconstruction
Older Patients
            Arthroplasty

NonViable Head (Any type and Duration ) – Arhtroplasty vs. Arthrodesis

Gupta’s Method
CR < 3 months , hip dislocation using traction and Abduction , Upper Tibia – 18 kgs.
When Head at or below acetabular margin , gradually abduct the limb and reduce wight at 3- 6 kgs every 4th day.
Once reduction achieved , maintain traction at 7 kgs for 2 weeks.
NWB for 4 weeks followed by gradual weight bearing to full weight bearing after 3 months,
Aim – Concetric reduction
At 3 months soft tissue develop inside acetabulum that prevents CR successful.

Malunited / Old Negelected Intertrochanteric Fracutre
Externally roatated , adduction in long stand cases (> 3 months )
Shortening (Supratrochanteric )
Prominent at greater trochanter region
Broadening and irregularity over Greater Trochanter
Decreased abduction , ER and Extension
Movement painful in all direction due to soft tissue impingement
Trendenlenburg test +
SLRT – active +ve , malunited doesnot hamper
Telescopic test –ve
Shortening at base of Bryant’s triangle , increased hypotenuse and perpendicular

D/D
Malunited basicervical neck of femur fracture
Malunited subtrochanteric fracture
Congenital Coxa vara
Neoplasia – GCT at greater trochanter
Sequelae of septic arthritis of hip
Neglected Dysplastic Dislocation of hip


Next Step
X-ray Hip – Involved Side – AP , Lat
 To look for configuration and status of hip
r/o primary pathology , neoplasia , osteoporosis
Long term Problems to patient
Shortening
Trendelenburg lurch
Reduced movements
Hip arthritis
Pain – Recent arthritis

Management
If hip movements are normal , muscle power regained
Options – Conservative
Surgery

Surgery
Corrective valgus osteotomy
Limb length improves
Abductor lurch improves
Pain on hip improves from abnormal transfer of forces across hip .
Complication
Infection
Non union
Patients need to be bed ridden for a week and slowly regain movement over a month to full wight bearing walk and complications of surgery.

Old Neglected Fracutres
( >3 weeks old ) , mobile on fluoroscopy
If < 6 weeks , Open reduction and Bone grafting
            Fixation with sliding hip screw
            Start patient on graduated hip mobilization , muscle strengthening exercises
If > 6 weeks old , not mobile on fluoroscopy
            Wait for fracture union , graduated muscle strengthening progress , osterotomy after 1 year for             fracture to consolidate
Management of IT Fracture
Assess patient medical condition
Most conservative way of management of IT fracture – surgery
Stable fracture – DHS
Unstable fracture -  Intramedullary Fixation

Classification of IT Fracture
Evan’s Classification
            Type I – Undisplaced 2 part intertrochanteric fracture
            Type II – Displaced 2 Fragment fracture
            Type III- 3 fragment fracture without posterolateral support (displaced GT fragment )
            Type IV – 3 Fragement fracture without medial support
            Type V – 4 Fragment fracture without posterolateral and medial support combination of Type III     and IV

R : Reverse Oblique

Unstable IT Frature
Reverse oblique
Lateral wall communition
Medial (posteromedial communition)
Transtrochanteric fracture
Subtrochanteric extension

Options for Stable IT fracture
Sliding hip screws (AO , DHS)
Varible Angle sliding hip screw
Talon compression hip screw
Medoff plate
Percutaneous Comrpession plate
Entry point for lag screw in DHS
2 cm below vastus lateralis ridge
Ideal position of the screw
Centre – centre position of head
Previous posteroinferior location recommendation no longer hold true
            Increased TAD , ECCENTRIC location leads to more rotational stress at fracture site and failure.
Ideal angle of barrel
Available : 135 degrees to 155  degrees
Unstable fracture – posteromedial defect
Force joint reaction transmitted at 160 degrees.


With a larger angle , head will be in valgus to put lag screw at centre – centre postion.This valgus angle leads to meadial gap and construct unstable. Also difficult to negotiate guidewire off the medial cortex to cntre in the head.
For such unstable construct some form of osteotomy is required to improve loading. Otherwise load to failure is higher for stable fracture as the bending forces are minimal and fracture is perpendicular to forces due to valgus reduction.
Practically at 135 degrees barrel plate , posteromedial opening is less and one comfortable places screw at centre of head reducing potential of iatrogenically  displacing the anatomical fracture reduction. Although bending moment is higher than larger angle barrel plate but its preferred for anatomical reduction.
Tip Apex Distance – First referred by Baumgartner , Sum total of distance in millimeter of screw tip of apex of medial femoral head in AP and lateral radiographically after magnification correction. Ideally – 11-25 mm but surgeons tend to TAD < 20 mm .
Why do you call this a lag screw ?

Screw sliding in a barrel plate has no fixed other end.
By itself  doesnot produce compression but facilitates compression . Compression is aided by separate compression screw at rear end of lag screw.

When not to give compression ?
Osteoporotic fractures and weak bones , Chances of screw pull out from concellous bone  so avoid it.

Use of Short barrel plate
Contains 4 holes
Barrel Length – chosen to facilitate optional sliding and collapse without letting screw jam inside barrel  plate under bending moment (Vertical Force )

Larger screw outside barrel plate  ,higher bending moment at screw barrel junction jamming screw.
            Smaller screw – screw touches barrel before complete consolidation occurred.
Short barrel plate for screw lengths less or equal to 80 mm and
Standard bareel length for 38 mm preferred.

            Option for IM Fixation of IT Fracture
-          Gamma nail (2nd , 3rd Generation)
-          PFN (Short and long )
-          Intermedullary Hip Screw
-          Trochanteric Hip screw
-          Trochanteric Antegrade Nail
Can all IT fractures be managed with IM Fixation and suited only for unstable IT fracture ?
            Suited only for unstable IT fracture.
            Fracture with large posterior fragment or 4 part fracture .
Fractures where GT not localized or reduced well are not suited for IM fixation due to entry point problems.
Better fixed with TBW of greater tochanter fragment and trochanteric stabilizing plate with a sliding screw fixation.
Alternatives – DCS , Condylar blade plate , (provide a prosthetic lateral wall of metal but unclear how well a support provided )
Thread length of DHS Lag screw
            Standard DHS Lag screw – 22 mm
            Thread diameter – 12.5 mm
            Shaft diameter – 8 mm
            Sizes available
                        50 – 145mm

Why not DHS for reverse oblique fractures (Slanting upward medially ) ?
Unable to resist medial displacement tendency of distal shaft fragment
Proximal fragment pulled by abducotrs and distally by adductors
Lag screw cant hold proximal fragment , it cant
Distal fragment ……
So failure occurs .
IM fixation best suited . DCS or CBP can be used provided there is no medial communition (Medial continuity and contact imperative else they will fail in varus collapse.

Pros and Cons for using IM implant
 Advantages
Ability to fix majority of fractures
Short surgical time and less blood loss for unstable IT fractures ( no differences comparing to DHS fixation for Stable IT fractures )
Smaller Moment arm to bear tensile forces and lesser calcar strain
            DHS produces 1.5 times calcar strain of a normal femur
IM < 10 % of strain
Better controlled collapse as bending moment at lag screw for nail is lesser than DHS.
Biomechanically nail construct more stiff (so more stable ) than DHS for torsion and bending forces )

Disadvantges
Abductor injury while insertion
Difficult revision by arthroplasty if fails
Anterior thigh pain due to impingement of nail tip
Curvature mismatch of nail and femora produces iatrogenic fracture
Stress concentration at nail tip leading to fracture
Costlier implant

Z-effect and Reverse Z effect
Complications arising from fixation of unstable proximal femoral fracture with PFN having 2 screws.

Z –effect – Lateral migration of caudal screw ,varus collapse and perforation of femoral head by superior screw
Reverse Z effect – Lateral migration of superior screw , varus collapse and femoral head cut out by inferior screw

Cause – Varus fixation of fracture , severe medial communition inapporopriate entry point and poor bony quality

Intraoperative procedures to stabilize with unstable IT fracture
Ostotomies and fixed with fixed angled nail plate design ( smith Peterson nail plate )
e..g. 1 Dimon – Hughston medial displacement osteotomy
        2 Sarmiento Valgus Osteotomy
        3 Wayne – County Lateral displacement Osteotomy
No evidence to support these osteotomies with sliding hip screw.


Mechanisms of failure of DHS
Non –union
Screw doesnot slide in barrel
            Screw penetration into hip joint
            Pulling out of  plate and shaft
                        (screws varus collapse )
            Cut out of lag screw through head
            Bending and break at barrel plate junction

Role of Arthroplasty for treatment of unstable IT fracture
            Higher failure rate of unstable IT fracture
            Difficult revision
            So many surgeons do it as a primary procedure

Cemented , Uncemented Hemi / THR – Better in terms of posteoperative complication

Cone prosthesis (Cementless ) – More popular as there is a higher chance of cementless stems subsiding into a wider femoral canal following osteolysis.

But costly , needs expertise.
For poor bone quality ,
            Pharmacotherapy – for osteoporosis , Ca , Vitamin D and oral/IV Bisphosphonates.
            Avoid using  compression screw intraoperatively.
Management options for poor bone purchase in osteoporosis – use bone cement to improve lag screw in femoral head to improve purchase else implants specific to minimize screw cut out.
            Delta Bolt
            Spiral Blade instead of screw
            Injecting cement into screw tract before putting screw
            Talon Compression screw

Role of Bisphosphonates in fracture Healing
            Give Calcium for 3/4 days prior to Bisphosphonates , Give Bisphosphonates at earliest.
            Doesnot delay callus
            No evidence till delay to delay bisphosphonates therapy

r-PTH –Acute stage – Role . with surgery , improves
            healing of bone
            locally administered improves implant anchorage

Non-Union Neck of Femur Fracture
            History of Trauma , inability to bear weight following trauma
            Tender midinguinal point
            Deasault’s sign +
            Telescopy +
            Trendelenburg test +
            Shortening and External Rotation

How to distinguish from Non –union IT Fracture ?
            Irregularity and broadening over trochanter
            Tenderness at trochanteric region rather than mid inguinal

Why not anterior dislocation ?
            Anterior dislocation has extension deformity , lengthening in low types of dislocation.
            Moreover , head not palpable in classic sites.

Why do you think head not dislocated ?
            B/L Narath’s sign +

D/D
            Old Fracture  rt femur head
            Old ununited IT fracture Rt femur
            Malunited Fracture acetabulum posterior wall/  superior wall both after IR deformity as        subluxation occurs posteriorly
            Old treated TB hip

Causes of Non-union Neck of Femur Fracture
            Morphological –high fracture angles – higher Pauwel types – Angle 60 – 90 degrees
            Displaced fractures- Garden type III and IV
            Fracture communition
            Inadequate reduction and stability of fixation
            Poor bone quality
            Injury to vascularity :Direct and tamponade effect (Deyerle)
            Absent cambium layer
            Chondrogenic factors in synovial fluid that inhibits callus formation
            Lack of haematoma formation
            Washing of haematoma formation
            Washing away and dilution of osteogenic factors

What type we see here ? Atrophic
Duration and its effect
            3 weeks – resorption of fracture ends
            Contractures prevent adequate lengthening and reduction
            Acetabular cartilage damage
Investigations

X-RAY – AP and Lateral
            One more view to see neck
           
MRI /Bone Scan – to see viability of head

Radiological Assessment
            Fracture angulation
            Osteopaenia
            Bone loss
            Osteonecrosis
            Calcar Formation        
            Varus Angulation
Lateral Projection        
            Flexion /extension
            Posterior Communition
            MRI /Bone scan to look for vialibity of femoral head


Osteonecrosis radiological assessment
            Grade 6 –Normal , all trabeculae present
            Grade 5 – Loss of trochanteric and secondary tensile , attenuated secondary compressive
            Grade 4 – Loss of secondary compressive , attenuation of primary tensile
            Grade 3 – Break in  primary tensile
            Grade 2 – loss of primary tensile
            Grade 1 – only primary compressive seen also reduced.

When to call non union of Neck of Femur Fracture ?
            At 3 months
Various Options
            ORIF with cancellous Bone grafting
            ORIF with Fibular Strut grafting
            ORIF with Vascularized bone grafting
            ORIF with Vascularized Fibula
            ORIF with Pedicle Bone grafting
            Neck reconstruction
            Osteotomy
            Arthrodesis
            Arthroplasty
            Girdlestone Resection Arthroplasty

Plan of surgery
            Age of Patient
            Presence of osteonecrosis
            Prior hip Symptoms : OA
            Co-morbidities
            Duration from injury
            Fracture variables
                        Site of fracture
                        Fracture configuration

How to classify non union neck of femur fracture ?
            Fracture surfaces
                        Irregular and Smooth
            Size of Proximal Fragment
                        2.5 cm or less
            Cap between fragments
                        Upto 1 cm
                        >1 cm
                        >2.5 cm
Guidelines
            Osteonecrosis and Non union
                        <50 –pedicle grafting vs arthrdesis vs osteotomy (Mc Murray’s)
                        >50 –arthroplasty
            Non and no osteonecrosis (preserved anatomy)
                        <65 years – osteosynthesis
                                             ORIF with Vascularized grafting
                                              ORIF with Fibular grafting
                                              
                        >65 years – Arthroplasty

Non union with destroyed anatomy (neck resorption, no osteonecrosis)
            <65 – Pauwel’s Type Osteotomy
            >40 – Neck Reconstruction
            >65 – Arthroplasty even after 40
Various muscle based grafting
            Muscle pedicle bone grafting
            Quadratus femoris based (Judet)
            Gluteus Medius based (Hibbs)
            Anterior Trochanteric bone grafting (Modified Hibbs)
            Sartorius based (Li)
            TFL Based (Bakshi)
            Gluteus Maximus based (Onosun)
           
Muscle Pedicle Perosteal (Myoperiosteal)
            Gltueus Maximus based (Frankel)
            Vastus Lateralis(Stuck)
Muscle Pedicle Periosteal
            Quadratus Femoris
Combined
            East Asian       
            Sartorius + Deep Circumflex femoral artery based
            Quadratus Based + Osteoperisoteal anterior grafting ?
           
Neck Reconstruction
            Devise trough at end (triangular like ) and fill this with bone graft
            Cage and autologus bone graft
                       

Advantages of Muscle Pedicle Bone grafting
            No substitute for original joint
            Always save a salvageable joint
            Vascularized graft – take care of osteotomy
            Pedicle grafts – less cumbersome than free grafts.

Principles of grafting technique

Vacularized grafts – increase vascularity of devascularized head
Hypovolaemic head turn into normovolaemic
Spontaneous revascularization after ORIF / CRIF stops at antero-superior region leading to   segmental collapse taken care of

Role of Osteotomy in treating Non union of NOF fracture
1.      Osteotomy alters both the mechanical and biological environment around non union which enhances healing or at least provides relief to patient
2.      Altering mechanics – medial shift of line of wight bearing
3.      Realignment of limb during movement
4.      Relaxation of joint capsule      
5.      Increased vascularity
6.      Psoas Relaxation providing pain relief by a mechanism similar to hanging hip of Voss ?
7.      Improved leverage and stability          
8.      Relief of Pressure by muscles
9.      Redistribution of tensile forces at fracture line to compressive forces leading to arm chair effect




             


           
           


           
Whatws arm chair effect ?
Mc Murray’s osteotomy ?
Distal fragement placed directly under its head so weight bearing transmitted directly from head to shaft bypassing neck. So shearing forces converted to compressive forces.
Getting up from a chair without supporting arms – shearing forces concentrate in knee in tensile manner.
Getting up from a chair with arms pushing chair – more or less situated at knee level or even front – dissipating shearing forces in knee.
Recommended for OA of Hip and Knee .

Various Osteotomies for treating hip Non Union
2 Land marks Osteotomies
1)Lineal Ostotomy – Medial dislplacement Ostotomy described by Hans revised by McMurray and Leadbetter .
2)Angulation Ostotomy  -Schanz Osteotomy with modification by Pauwel’s
Mc Murray’s
Medial displacement oblique intertrochanteric osteotomy with PSO .
Principles of Mc Murray’s Osteotomy
1 Upper end of shaft must be just below the edge of acetabulum
2 There must be union between portion of divided femur
Conditions he descrived
OA hip joint , pain , stiffness and deformity
There should be 70 degree flexion at hip.

Pre-requisites
No coxa magna , loss of sphericity of head in both AP and Lateral , dysplastic acetabulum ,subluxation ,inflammatory diseases and ankylsoing spondylitis

How to do it and how to fix it ?
Line of Osteotomy – base of greater trochanter obliquely up (10-15 degrees) to lesser trochanter
Medial displacement of distal fragment
Fixation with WainWright – Hammond Spline plate
By doing adduction , it tilts proximal fragment into valgus making fracture line horizontal .
Mc Murray’s Osteotomy Disadvatnages
Shortening ,Lurching , Frequent Non union at ostotomy site , Difficult future THR
(so not to displace > 50 % ) , genu valgum of  ipsilateral knee

Pauwel’s Osteotomy
Replaces Pseudoarthrosis site to remove shear forces
Osteotomy to enhance fracture healing and other benefits
            . Equlizes limb length
            Lateralization
            Early mobilization by fixing osteotomy
Planning : Body forces subtend an anle of 16 degrees at hip joint.Anatomical axis – 8-10 degrees to body forces so pseudoarthrosis site is subjected to forces at aroind 25 degrees . Substract this from pseudoarthrosis (Pauwel’s angle)
This gives wedge angle to be resected at osteotomy site.Same principle applies for Mc Murray’s osteotomy described for Pseuoarthrosis  of femur Neck.

Which test describes instability at hip joint ?
Telescopy test – Significant telescopy ( > 1 cm trochanter excursion in one direction ) is a good indicator of unstable hip joint , whilest absence of same doesnot substantiate stability.
Telescopy due to absorbed neck , communition at fracture site , tearing of capsule in high impact unjuries.

Tests you can see?
Due to  limitations of telescopic test ,active SLRT  (Stinchfield test ) can be performed.
SLRT – fallacious (false negative ) in impacted fragments ,capsule contracture ,leverage of distal fragment on acetabulum margin.
Absent (false positive)  in a frail patient and cant be done in hemiplegic or paraplegic patient.

Various closed reduction manouevres for fracture in NOF ?
Manouevres in Extension
            Whitman
            Deyerle
            Swinotkowsi
Manouevres in Flexion
Leadbetter : Flexion , IR , Circumduction to abduction and extension ; check by resting heel on palm. It it rest without ER then it’s a secure reduction
Flynn
Smith Peterson Method (gentle Lead Better method )

Assessment of Alignment
Garden’s Index
            AP – 160 , Lateral 180 degrees , Radiographs required
            155 -180 degrees acceptable
Lowell’s S-curves : Image intensification
Mc Elvenny : Hat on hook position
Lindequist and Tronkvist
            Criteria of good reduction < /= 2 mm displacement , AP Garden angulation of 160 – 175 degrees     and lateral angulation of </= 10 degrees.

Shape of Fracture in Neck of Femur fracture
Spiral

Classification
Gardens’s
Complete / Incomplete
Degrees of Displacement
Garden’s Index : based on trabecular disposition in AP (160 ) and Lateral (180) projection
1 Incomplete ,valgus impacted fracture with trabecular displacement (increase Garden’s index in AP , Normal in lateral )
2 Complete ,undisplaced , +/- impaction
3 Complete , displaced (partial displacement < 50 degrees
4 complete ,displaced > 50 percent and dissociation between proximal and distal fragments so that proximal one realigns ) with acetabular trabeculae

Eliassen – Undisplaced (Type 1 , 2 )
-          Displace (Type 3 and 4 )
Linton’s Classification
1 fracture in adduction (varus displacement /angulation : Garden’s Index decrease )
2 fracture in abduction (valgus displacement /valgus angulation )
3 Intermediate type

Pauwel’s Classification
            Angle of Fracture line < 30 degrees
            Angle of Fracture  line 30-50 degrees
            Angle of Fracture line > 50 and </=  70 degrees
Anatomical : subcapital , transcervical ,basicervical
AO
Current classification (Caviglia , Osorio ,Commando )
5 types
             Completeness , contact , angulation and communition
Stress NOF fracture (Fulkerson and Snowdy )
            1 Tension stress fracture – superolateral aspect of neck , increase risk of displacement
            2 compression stress fracture – inferomedial , risk of displacement decrease
            3 completely displpaced NOF Fracture , displaced
Classification in children (Delbet and Colona )
            1 Transphyseal : involves physis +/- dislocation of femur head ,ABER
            2 Transcervical fracture (most common ) – displaced ,unstable ,
                        Osteonecorosis proportional to displacement
            3 Cervicotrochanteric ,2nd most common
            4 Interotrochanteric – good fracture
Blood supply of femoral head
             Crock description – 3 sources
             A Metaphysis
            B Retinacular
            C Foveal
Extracapsular Arterial Ring of Chung – at base of femoral neck posteriorly – MCFA ,
                        Anteriorly –LFCA ,branch of Profunda Femoris Artery
Ascending Cervical Branches of ECA (aka Epiphyseal artery of Trueta or retinacular arteries ) from ECA.
Divided into anterior posterior medial and lateral groups
Lateral group most important .

Subsynovial intra-articular arterial ring of chung
            (Circulus articuli vascularis of Hunter ) formed from lateral ascending cervical vesssels ,located at margins of articular cartilage on surface of neck of femur
Artery of ligamentum Teres
Branch of obturator (more often ) or medial circumflex femoral artery .
Metaphyseal femoral neck – supplied by a cruciate shaped anastomosis between
            Bracnhes from ascending cervical bracnhes
            Branches from subsynovial intraarticular arterial ring
            Branches of superior nutrient artery system
Metaphyseal vessels from Intertrochanteric region

How to look for Protusio Acetabuli ?
Distance between medial wall of acetabulum and pelvic brim
Gr  I  1-5 mm (Mild )
Gr II  6-15 mm (Moderate )
Gr III > 15 mm (Severe )

Causes
1 Familial /Idiopathic (Otto Pelvis )
2 Rheumatoid Arthritis and JCA
3 Osteoporosis
4 Ostomalacia and Rickets
5 Marfans’s Syndrome ( 45 % have protusio in 50 % )
6 Paget’s
7 Ankylosing Spondylitis
8 OA
9 Acetabular Fractures
10 Osteogenesis Imperfecta




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Outline of Treatment of Spinal Tuberculosis

COXA VARA

Paediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture

Timing and Outcome of Surgery in Hip Fractures

Hind Foot amputation