Algorithm 4 for management of Fracture and Dislcocation around Hip Joint
Old
Unreduced Dislocations and Fracture Dislocations
Examination
FADIR
Shortening
Wasting
ASIS
often high due to adduction deformity
Round
hard , globular swelling palpable in gluteal region
Crepitus
Movement
– present only in sagittal plane
Inverted
Bryan’ts Triangle
Sciatic
Nerve injury (Foot drop )
D/D
Pathological Hip Dislocation (TB Hip
,Septic Arthrits )
TB with Destruction of head (painful
global restriction of motion in active stage or fibrosis or ankylosis or hypermobile unstable hip
in healed disease )
AVN hip with destruction of head
will have secondary OA and often have external rotation
Old Unreduced Fracture Neck Femur
Investigation
Xray –
- Loss of congruity of femoral head
and Acetabulum
-
Broken
shenton Minard line
-
Proximal
migration of greater trochanter
-
Smaller
Obturator foramen
-
Samallr
Ilium
-
Less
prominent trochanter
-
Adducted
Femur
CT
– To assess associated fracture of Acetabulum ,
MRI
–to look for vascularity of head and condition of acetabular soft tissues
Management
Depends on Thompson and Epstein
Classification and Vacularity of Head and Patients condition
Thompson
and Epestein for posterior dislocation
Type
I
Posterior
Dislocation +/- Acetabular fracture
Type
II
Posterior
Dislocation +/- Posterior wall fracture
Type
III
Posterior
Dislocation + communited rim fracture acetabulum
Type
IV
Posterior
dislocation + Rim and floor fracture
Type V
Posterior
Dislocation + Head of femur fracture
Management
Type
I
< 3 months – CR under GA , Gupta’s traction
>3
months – Gupta’s method
Open reduction via anterior or anterolateral approach
Type
II
< 3 months – Open Reduction + Acetabular
Reconstruction , Preliminary traction
>3
months – Arthroplasty versus Arthrodesis
(Acetabular
cartilage damaged during soft tissue curettage )
Type
III
Like
Type II
Type
IV and V
Younger
Patients
Open Reduction and Reconstruction
Older
Patients
Arthroplasty
NonViable
Head (Any type and Duration ) – Arhtroplasty vs. Arthrodesis
Gupta’s
Method
CR
< 3 months , hip dislocation using traction and Abduction , Upper Tibia – 18
kgs.
When
Head at or below acetabular margin , gradually abduct the limb and reduce wight
at 3- 6 kgs every 4th day.
Once
reduction achieved , maintain traction at 7 kgs for 2 weeks.
NWB
for 4 weeks followed by gradual weight bearing to full weight bearing after 3
months,
Aim
– Concetric reduction
At
3 months soft tissue develop inside acetabulum that prevents CR successful.
Malunited
/ Old Negelected Intertrochanteric Fracutre
Externally
roatated , adduction in long stand cases (> 3 months )
Shortening
(Supratrochanteric )
Prominent
at greater trochanter region
Broadening
and irregularity over Greater Trochanter
Decreased
abduction , ER and Extension
Movement
painful in all direction due to soft tissue impingement
Trendenlenburg
test +
SLRT
– active +ve , malunited doesnot hamper
Telescopic
test –ve
Shortening
at base of Bryant’s triangle , increased hypotenuse and perpendicular
D/D
Malunited
basicervical neck of femur fracture
Malunited
subtrochanteric fracture
Congenital
Coxa vara
Neoplasia
– GCT at greater trochanter
Sequelae
of septic arthritis of hip
Neglected
Dysplastic Dislocation of hip
Next
Step
X-ray
Hip – Involved Side – AP , Lat
To look for configuration and status of hip
r/o
primary pathology , neoplasia , osteoporosis
Long
term Problems to patient
Shortening
Trendelenburg
lurch
Reduced
movements
Hip
arthritis
Pain
– Recent arthritis
Management
If
hip movements are normal , muscle power regained
Options
– Conservative
Surgery
Surgery
Corrective
valgus osteotomy
Limb
length improves
Abductor
lurch improves
Pain
on hip improves from abnormal transfer of forces across hip .
Complication
Infection
Non
union
Patients
need to be bed ridden for a week and slowly regain movement over a month to
full wight bearing walk and complications of surgery.
Old
Neglected Fracutres
(
>3 weeks old ) , mobile on fluoroscopy
If
< 6 weeks , Open reduction and Bone grafting
Fixation with sliding hip screw
Start patient on graduated hip
mobilization , muscle strengthening exercises
If
> 6 weeks old , not mobile on fluoroscopy
Wait for fracture union , graduated
muscle strengthening progress , osterotomy after 1 year for fracture to consolidate
Management
of IT Fracture
Assess
patient medical condition
Most
conservative way of management of IT fracture – surgery
Stable
fracture – DHS
Unstable
fracture - Intramedullary Fixation
Classification
of IT Fracture
Evan’s
Classification
Type I – Undisplaced 2 part
intertrochanteric fracture
Type II – Displaced 2 Fragment
fracture
Type III- 3 fragment fracture
without posterolateral support (displaced GT fragment )
Type IV – 3 Fragement fracture
without medial support
Type V – 4 Fragment fracture without
posterolateral and medial support combination of Type III and IV
R
: Reverse Oblique
Unstable
IT Frature
Reverse
oblique
Lateral
wall communition
Medial
(posteromedial communition)
Transtrochanteric
fracture
Subtrochanteric
extension
Options
for Stable IT fracture
Sliding
hip screws (AO , DHS)
Varible
Angle sliding hip screw
Talon
compression hip screw
Medoff
plate
Percutaneous
Comrpession plate
Entry
point for lag screw in DHS
2
cm below vastus lateralis ridge
Ideal
position of the screw
Centre
– centre position of head
Previous
posteroinferior location recommendation no longer hold true
Increased TAD , ECCENTRIC location
leads to more rotational stress at fracture site and failure.
Ideal
angle of barrel
Available
: 135 degrees to 155 degrees
Unstable
fracture – posteromedial defect
Force
joint reaction transmitted at 160 degrees.
With
a larger angle , head will be in valgus to put lag screw at centre – centre
postion.This valgus angle leads to meadial gap and construct unstable. Also
difficult to negotiate guidewire off the medial cortex to cntre in the head.
For
such unstable construct some form of osteotomy is required to improve loading.
Otherwise load to failure is higher for stable fracture as the bending forces
are minimal and fracture is perpendicular to forces due to valgus reduction.
Practically
at 135 degrees barrel plate , posteromedial opening is less and one comfortable
places screw at centre of head reducing potential of iatrogenically displacing the anatomical fracture reduction.
Although bending moment is higher than larger angle barrel plate but its
preferred for anatomical reduction.
Tip
Apex Distance – First referred by Baumgartner , Sum total of distance in
millimeter of screw tip of apex of medial femoral head in AP and lateral
radiographically after magnification correction. Ideally – 11-25 mm but
surgeons tend to TAD < 20 mm .
Why
do you call this a lag screw ?
Screw
sliding in a barrel plate has no fixed other end.
By
itself doesnot produce compression but
facilitates compression . Compression is aided by separate compression screw at
rear end of lag screw.
When
not to give compression ?
Osteoporotic
fractures and weak bones , Chances of screw pull out from concellous bone so avoid it.
Use
of Short barrel plate
Contains
4 holes
Barrel
Length – chosen to facilitate optional sliding and collapse without letting
screw jam inside barrel plate under
bending moment (Vertical Force )
Larger
screw outside barrel plate ,higher
bending moment at screw barrel junction jamming screw.
Smaller screw – screw touches barrel
before complete consolidation occurred.
Short
barrel plate for screw lengths less or equal to 80 mm and
Standard
bareel length for 38 mm preferred.
Option for IM Fixation of IT
Fracture
-
Gamma
nail (2nd , 3rd Generation)
-
PFN
(Short and long )
-
Intermedullary
Hip Screw
-
Trochanteric
Hip screw
-
Trochanteric
Antegrade Nail
Can
all IT fractures be managed with IM Fixation and suited only for unstable IT
fracture ?
Suited only for unstable IT fracture.
Fracture with large posterior
fragment or 4 part fracture .
Fractures
where GT not localized or reduced well are not suited for IM fixation due to
entry point problems.
Better
fixed with TBW of greater tochanter fragment and trochanteric stabilizing plate
with a sliding screw fixation.
Alternatives
– DCS , Condylar blade plate , (provide a prosthetic lateral wall of metal but
unclear how well a support provided )
Thread
length of DHS Lag screw
Standard DHS Lag screw – 22 mm
Thread diameter – 12.5 mm
Shaft diameter – 8 mm
Sizes available
50 – 145mm
Why
not DHS for reverse oblique fractures (Slanting upward medially ) ?
Unable
to resist medial displacement tendency of distal shaft fragment
Proximal
fragment pulled by abducotrs and distally by adductors
Lag
screw cant hold proximal fragment , it cant
Distal
fragment ……
So
failure occurs .
IM
fixation best suited . DCS or CBP can be used provided there is no medial
communition (Medial continuity and contact imperative else they will fail in
varus collapse.
Pros
and Cons for using IM implant
Advantages
Ability
to fix majority of fractures
Short
surgical time and less blood loss for unstable IT fractures ( no differences
comparing to DHS fixation for Stable IT fractures )
Smaller
Moment arm to bear tensile forces and lesser calcar strain
DHS produces 1.5 times calcar strain
of a normal femur
IM
< 10 % of strain
Better
controlled collapse as bending moment at lag screw for nail is lesser than DHS.
Biomechanically
nail construct more stiff (so more stable ) than DHS for torsion and bending
forces )
Disadvantges
Abductor
injury while insertion
Difficult
revision by arthroplasty if fails
Anterior
thigh pain due to impingement of nail tip
Curvature
mismatch of nail and femora produces iatrogenic fracture
Stress
concentration at nail tip leading to fracture
Costlier
implant
Z-effect
and Reverse Z effect
Complications
arising from fixation of unstable proximal femoral fracture with PFN having 2
screws.
Z
–effect – Lateral migration of caudal screw ,varus collapse and perforation of
femoral head by superior screw
Reverse
Z effect – Lateral migration of superior screw , varus collapse and femoral
head cut out by inferior screw
Cause
– Varus fixation of fracture , severe medial communition inapporopriate entry
point and poor bony quality
Intraoperative
procedures to stabilize with unstable IT fracture
Ostotomies
and fixed with fixed angled nail plate design ( smith Peterson nail plate )
e..g.
1 Dimon – Hughston medial displacement osteotomy
2 Sarmiento Valgus Osteotomy
3 Wayne – County Lateral displacement
Osteotomy
No
evidence to support these osteotomies with sliding hip screw.
Mechanisms
of failure of DHS
Non
–union
Screw
doesnot slide in barrel
Screw penetration into hip joint
Pulling out of plate and shaft
(screws varus collapse )
Cut out of lag screw through head
Bending and break at barrel plate
junction
Role
of Arthroplasty for treatment of unstable IT fracture
Higher failure rate of unstable IT
fracture
Difficult revision
So many surgeons do it as a primary
procedure
Cemented
, Uncemented Hemi / THR – Better in terms of posteoperative complication
Cone
prosthesis (Cementless ) – More popular as there is a higher chance of cementless
stems subsiding into a wider femoral canal following osteolysis.
But
costly , needs expertise.
For
poor bone quality ,
Pharmacotherapy – for osteoporosis ,
Ca , Vitamin D and oral/IV Bisphosphonates.
Avoid using compression screw intraoperatively.
Management
options for poor bone purchase in osteoporosis – use bone cement to improve lag
screw in femoral head to improve purchase else implants specific to minimize
screw cut out.
Delta Bolt
Spiral Blade instead of screw
Injecting cement into screw tract
before putting screw
Talon Compression screw
Role
of Bisphosphonates in fracture Healing
Give Calcium for 3/4 days prior to
Bisphosphonates , Give Bisphosphonates at earliest.
Doesnot delay callus
No evidence till delay to delay bisphosphonates
therapy
r-PTH
–Acute stage – Role . with surgery , improves
healing of bone
locally administered improves
implant anchorage
Non-Union
Neck of Femur Fracture
History of Trauma , inability to
bear weight following trauma
Tender midinguinal point
Deasault’s sign +
Telescopy +
Trendelenburg test +
Shortening and External Rotation
How
to distinguish from Non –union IT Fracture ?
Irregularity and broadening over
trochanter
Tenderness at trochanteric region
rather than mid inguinal
Why
not anterior dislocation ?
Anterior dislocation has extension
deformity , lengthening in low types of dislocation.
Moreover , head not palpable in
classic sites.
Why
do you think head not dislocated ?
B/L Narath’s sign +
D/D
Old Fracture rt femur head
Old ununited IT fracture Rt femur
Malunited Fracture acetabulum
posterior wall/ superior wall both after
IR deformity as subluxation occurs
posteriorly
Old treated TB hip
Causes
of Non-union Neck of Femur Fracture
Morphological –high fracture angles
– higher Pauwel types – Angle 60 – 90 degrees
Displaced fractures- Garden type III
and IV
Fracture communition
Inadequate reduction and stability
of fixation
Poor bone quality
Injury to vascularity :Direct and
tamponade effect (Deyerle)
Absent cambium layer
Chondrogenic factors in synovial
fluid that inhibits callus formation
Lack of haematoma formation
Washing of haematoma formation
Washing away and dilution of
osteogenic factors
What
type we see here ? Atrophic
Duration
and its effect
3 weeks – resorption of fracture
ends
Contractures prevent adequate
lengthening and reduction
Acetabular cartilage damage
Investigations
X-RAY
– AP and Lateral
One more view to see neck
MRI
/Bone Scan – to see viability of head
Radiological
Assessment
Fracture angulation
Osteopaenia
Bone loss
Osteonecrosis
Calcar Formation
Varus Angulation
Lateral
Projection
Flexion /extension
Posterior Communition
MRI /Bone scan to look for vialibity
of femoral head
Osteonecrosis
radiological assessment
Grade 6 –Normal , all trabeculae
present
Grade 5 – Loss of trochanteric and
secondary tensile , attenuated secondary compressive
Grade 4 – Loss of secondary
compressive , attenuation of primary tensile
Grade 3 – Break in primary tensile
Grade 2 – loss of primary tensile
Grade 1 – only primary compressive
seen also reduced.
When
to call non union of Neck of Femur Fracture ?
At 3 months
Various
Options
ORIF with cancellous Bone grafting
ORIF with Fibular Strut grafting
ORIF with Vascularized bone grafting
ORIF with Vascularized Fibula
ORIF with Pedicle Bone grafting
Neck reconstruction
Osteotomy
Arthrodesis
Arthroplasty
Girdlestone Resection Arthroplasty
Plan
of surgery
Age of Patient
Presence of osteonecrosis
Prior hip Symptoms : OA
Co-morbidities
Duration from injury
Fracture variables
Site of fracture
Fracture configuration
How
to classify non union neck of femur fracture ?
Fracture surfaces
Irregular and Smooth
Size of Proximal Fragment
2.5 cm or less
Cap between fragments
Upto 1 cm
>1 cm
>2.5 cm
Guidelines
Osteonecrosis and Non union
<50 –pedicle grafting
vs arthrdesis vs osteotomy (Mc Murray’s)
>50 –arthroplasty
Non and no osteonecrosis (preserved
anatomy)
<65 years –
osteosynthesis
ORIF with Vascularized grafting
ORIF with Fibular grafting
>65 years –
Arthroplasty
Non
union with destroyed anatomy (neck resorption, no osteonecrosis)
<65 – Pauwel’s Type Osteotomy
>40 – Neck Reconstruction
>65 – Arthroplasty even after 40
Various
muscle based grafting
Muscle pedicle bone grafting
Quadratus femoris based (Judet)
Gluteus Medius based (Hibbs)
Anterior Trochanteric bone grafting
(Modified Hibbs)
Sartorius based (Li)
TFL Based (Bakshi)
Gluteus Maximus based (Onosun)
Muscle
Pedicle Perosteal (Myoperiosteal)
Gltueus Maximus based (Frankel)
Vastus Lateralis(Stuck)
Muscle
Pedicle Periosteal
Quadratus Femoris
Combined
East Asian
Sartorius + Deep Circumflex femoral
artery based
Quadratus Based + Osteoperisoteal
anterior grafting ?
Neck
Reconstruction
Devise trough at end (triangular
like ) and fill this with bone graft
Cage and autologus bone graft
Advantages
of Muscle Pedicle Bone grafting
No substitute for original joint
Always save a salvageable joint
Vascularized graft – take care of
osteotomy
Pedicle grafts – less cumbersome
than free grafts.
Principles
of grafting technique
Vacularized grafts – increase
vascularity of devascularized head
Hypovolaemic head turn into
normovolaemic
Spontaneous revascularization
after ORIF / CRIF stops at antero-superior region leading to segmental collapse taken care of
Role
of Osteotomy in treating Non union of NOF fracture
1.
Osteotomy
alters both the mechanical and biological environment around non union which
enhances healing or at least provides relief to patient
2.
Altering
mechanics – medial shift of line of wight bearing
3.
Realignment
of limb during movement
4.
Relaxation
of joint capsule
5.
Increased
vascularity
6.
Psoas
Relaxation providing pain relief by a mechanism similar to hanging hip of Voss
?
7.
Improved
leverage and stability
8.
Relief
of Pressure by muscles
9.
Redistribution
of tensile forces at fracture line to compressive forces leading to arm chair
effect
Whatws
arm chair effect ?
Mc
Murray’s osteotomy ?
Distal
fragement placed directly under its head so weight bearing transmitted directly
from head to shaft bypassing neck. So shearing forces converted to compressive
forces.
Getting
up from a chair without supporting arms – shearing forces concentrate in knee
in tensile manner.
Getting
up from a chair with arms pushing chair – more or less situated at knee level
or even front – dissipating shearing forces in knee.
Recommended
for OA of Hip and Knee .
Various
Osteotomies for treating hip Non Union
2
Land marks Osteotomies
1)Lineal
Ostotomy – Medial dislplacement Ostotomy described by Hans revised by McMurray
and Leadbetter .
2)Angulation
Ostotomy -Schanz Osteotomy with
modification by Pauwel’s
Mc
Murray’s
Medial
displacement oblique intertrochanteric osteotomy with PSO .
Principles
of Mc Murray’s Osteotomy
1
Upper end of shaft must be just below the edge of acetabulum
2
There must be union between portion of divided femur
Conditions
he descrived
OA
hip joint , pain , stiffness and deformity
There
should be 70 degree flexion at hip.
Pre-requisites
No
coxa magna , loss of sphericity of head in both AP and Lateral , dysplastic
acetabulum ,subluxation ,inflammatory diseases and ankylsoing spondylitis
How
to do it and how to fix it ?
Line
of Osteotomy – base of greater trochanter obliquely up (10-15 degrees) to
lesser trochanter
Medial
displacement of distal fragment
Fixation
with WainWright – Hammond Spline plate
By
doing adduction , it tilts proximal fragment into valgus making fracture line
horizontal .
Mc
Murray’s Osteotomy Disadvatnages
Shortening
,Lurching , Frequent Non union at ostotomy site , Difficult future THR
(so
not to displace > 50 % ) , genu valgum of
ipsilateral knee
Pauwel’s
Osteotomy
Replaces
Pseudoarthrosis site to remove shear forces
Osteotomy
to enhance fracture healing and other benefits
. Equlizes limb length
Lateralization
Early mobilization by fixing
osteotomy
Planning
: Body forces subtend an anle of 16 degrees at hip joint.Anatomical axis – 8-10
degrees to body forces so pseudoarthrosis site is subjected to forces at aroind
25 degrees . Substract this from pseudoarthrosis (Pauwel’s angle)
This
gives wedge angle to be resected at osteotomy site.Same principle applies for
Mc Murray’s osteotomy described for Pseuoarthrosis of femur Neck.
Which
test describes instability at hip joint ?
Telescopy
test – Significant telescopy ( > 1 cm trochanter excursion in one direction
) is a good indicator of unstable hip joint , whilest absence of same doesnot
substantiate stability.
Telescopy
due to absorbed neck , communition at fracture site , tearing of capsule in
high impact unjuries.
Tests
you can see?
Due
to limitations of telescopic test ,active
SLRT (Stinchfield test ) can be
performed.
SLRT
– fallacious (false negative ) in impacted fragments ,capsule contracture
,leverage of distal fragment on acetabulum margin.
Absent
(false positive) in a frail patient and
cant be done in hemiplegic or paraplegic patient.
Various
closed reduction manouevres for fracture in NOF ?
Manouevres
in Extension
Whitman
Deyerle
Swinotkowsi
Manouevres
in Flexion
Leadbetter
: Flexion , IR , Circumduction to abduction and extension ; check by resting
heel on palm. It it rest without ER then it’s a secure reduction
Flynn
Smith
Peterson Method (gentle Lead Better method )
Assessment
of Alignment
Garden’s
Index
AP – 160 , Lateral 180 degrees ,
Radiographs required
155 -180 degrees acceptable
Lowell’s
S-curves : Image intensification
Mc
Elvenny : Hat on hook position
Lindequist
and Tronkvist
Criteria of good reduction < /= 2
mm displacement , AP Garden angulation of 160 – 175 degrees and lateral angulation of </= 10 degrees.
Shape
of Fracture in Neck of Femur fracture
Spiral
Classification
Gardens’s
Complete
/ Incomplete
Degrees
of Displacement
Garden’s
Index : based on trabecular disposition in AP (160 ) and Lateral (180)
projection
1
Incomplete ,valgus impacted fracture with trabecular displacement (increase
Garden’s index in AP , Normal in lateral )
2
Complete ,undisplaced , +/- impaction
3
Complete , displaced (partial displacement < 50 degrees
4
complete ,displaced > 50 percent and dissociation between proximal and
distal fragments so that proximal one realigns ) with acetabular trabeculae
Eliassen
– Undisplaced (Type 1 , 2 )
-
Displace
(Type 3 and 4 )
Linton’s
Classification
1
fracture in adduction (varus displacement /angulation : Garden’s Index decrease
)
2
fracture in abduction (valgus displacement /valgus angulation )
3
Intermediate type
Pauwel’s
Classification
Angle of Fracture line < 30
degrees
Angle of Fracture line 30-50 degrees
Angle of Fracture line > 50 and
</= 70 degrees
Anatomical
: subcapital , transcervical ,basicervical
AO
Current
classification (Caviglia , Osorio ,Commando )
5
types
Completeness , contact , angulation and
communition
Stress
NOF fracture (Fulkerson and Snowdy )
1 Tension stress fracture –
superolateral aspect of neck , increase risk of displacement
2 compression stress fracture –
inferomedial , risk of displacement decrease
3 completely displpaced NOF Fracture
, displaced
Classification
in children (Delbet and Colona )
1 Transphyseal : involves physis +/-
dislocation of femur head ,ABER
2 Transcervical fracture (most
common ) – displaced ,unstable ,
Osteonecorosis
proportional to displacement
3 Cervicotrochanteric ,2nd
most common
4 Interotrochanteric – good fracture
Blood
supply of femoral head
Crock description – 3 sources
A Metaphysis
B Retinacular
C Foveal
Extracapsular
Arterial Ring of Chung – at base of femoral neck posteriorly – MCFA ,
Anteriorly –LFCA ,branch
of Profunda Femoris Artery
Ascending
Cervical Branches of ECA (aka Epiphyseal artery of Trueta or retinacular
arteries ) from ECA.
Divided
into anterior posterior medial and lateral groups
Lateral
group most important .
Subsynovial
intra-articular arterial ring of chung
(Circulus articuli vascularis of
Hunter ) formed from lateral ascending cervical vesssels ,located at margins of
articular cartilage on surface of neck of femur
Artery
of ligamentum Teres
Branch
of obturator (more often ) or medial circumflex femoral artery .
Metaphyseal
femoral neck – supplied by a cruciate shaped anastomosis between
Bracnhes from ascending cervical
bracnhes
Branches from subsynovial intraarticular
arterial ring
Branches of superior nutrient artery
system
Metaphyseal
vessels from Intertrochanteric region
How
to look for Protusio Acetabuli ?
Distance
between medial wall of acetabulum and pelvic brim
Gr I 1-5
mm (Mild )
Gr
II 6-15 mm (Moderate )
Gr
III > 15 mm (Severe )
Causes
1
Familial /Idiopathic (Otto Pelvis )
2
Rheumatoid Arthritis and JCA
3
Osteoporosis
4
Ostomalacia and Rickets
5
Marfans’s Syndrome ( 45 % have protusio in 50 % )
6
Paget’s
7
Ankylosing Spondylitis
8
OA
9
Acetabular Fractures
10
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Comments
Post a Comment